SECTION
Estate Planning
Trusts and Estates
   Similar Categories
Estate Planning Links
Wills and Executors
   Get a Quote!
Mortgage
Annuities
Life Insurance
Joint Life
Long Term Care
Group Benefits/Insurance
Critical Illness Insurance
Disability Insurance
   Referrals
Financial Planner
Lawyer
Accountant
Estate Planner
Find A Realtor


    

Spotlight on the Inheritor’s Trust(TM)

The following is excerpted from the article at http://www.financialcounsel.com/home.asp with permission from the author.
The following is excerpted from the article at http://www.financialcounsel.com/home.asp with permission from the author.


Are trusts gaining in popularity? Are more people using trusts? Are trusts being used to accomplish new objectives?

A recent increase in the total value of assets held in personal trusts reflects the growth of asset values in general without explaining how many new trusts are being created, what types of provisions they include, or what is motivating the grantors. Even when there is more data to go on (years after the fact), the results will remain debatable.

But there is anecdotal evidence that trusts are very much alive and well. In particular, irrevocable living trusts are capable of implementing the most effective gift transfers for tax purposes. However, a variety of provisions, including "trust protector" clauses, may be used to retain far more flexibility than many people realize.1

Let’s review how classic trusts are being adapted to the rules and circumstances that are now being transformed around us.

In particular, there has been a great deal of the recent interest focused on the Inheritor’s TrustTM over the past two years. One of the principals behind this arrangement, attorney Richard A. Oshins, was most generous in providing insights about the technique as well as its reception.

Change in Focus

It might be argued that as we draw closer to the repeal of the estate tax, there is a shift away from trusts which concentrate merely on minimizing transfer taxes and a rise in those arrangements which address long-term asset protection.

As with any trend that evolves over time, it becomes impossible to pinpoint the exact time when things began to change or to identify a specific triggering incident, but there were certainly major changes that were already in motion prior to the enactment of the estate tax repeal in 2001.

For example, the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 would have increased the estate tax exemption to shield $1 million of an estate by 2006. That law also introduced a $1.3 million exclusion for small-business owners.

Dynasty trusts and other long-term asset protection trusts were becoming increasingly popular. A critical factor of planning was the incorporation of flexibility into long-term irrevocable trusts. In “Making Irrevocable Trusts Flexible,” the June, 1997 issue of The Estate Analyst recapped the many powers which can be given to trusts:

· Power to invade principal · Power to amend the trust · Power to change trustees · Power to change trust situs · Power to substitute charitable beneficiaries · Power to correct drafting errors · Power to invest in grantor’s family business · Power to invest more aggressively · Power to protect Medicaid eligibility

“Trust protectors” had come into vogue by then. The trust protector concept had been employed in the United Kingdom and off-shore tax haven jurisdictions for many years. A trust protector could simply be a separate trustee who would be empowered to exercise one or more powers, such as those listed above.

A Change in Context

In 2001, Lawyer’s Weekly noted the growing use of trust protectors by trust draftsmen and attorneys in standard, garden-variety trusts. By that time, the likelihood of significant tax reforms, including an estate tax repeal, had made trust flexibility of paramount importance.

If you will indulge a tangential observation concerning the growing reliance on health-care proxies to be used in conjunction with living wills, one may wonder if there has been a crossover effect.

Like a trust protector, a health-care proxy, i.e., an individual holding a power of attorney for health care, is a way of protecting an individual’s preferences in the future by appointing a representative who can review changed circumstances and take appropriate action. Whether in the context of living wills or investment trusts, the flexibility of having a “trust protector” or a “health-care proxy” is simple, practical, and effective.

Changes to the Bankruptcy Code which will take effect in October may also play a role in the evolution of trust planning. There will be a 10-year limit on assets transferred to a self-settled domestic asset protection trust (DAPT).

With more restrictions on the bankruptcy solution to creditor problems in general, a variety of alternatives must be considered. Establishing a long-term, beneficiary-controlled trust that will be set up long before any potential bankruptcy (or divorce, or litigation) avoids such worst-case scenarios.

Disclaimer trusts are another useful feature being added to wills in states which may or may not decouple from Federal law and adopt or modify state death taxes or state death tax exemption levels.

Dynasty Planning

A new generation of well-informed estate planning professionals have implemented multi-generational planning in thousands, if not millions, of estates. These may be called “dynasty trusts” in certain respects. And they are well equipped to protect not only against estate and transfer taxation but also creditors and divorce.

But the Inheritor’s TrustTM, has added an extra dimension to dynasty trusts. It moves the starting point from the plan back from the client’s estate to the previous generation, i.e., to assets that have not yet been inherited.2

We are talking about the largest bulge of wealth to be transferred in history. It is the life savings of “the greatest generation” which are about to pass to “the baby boomer” generation.

The Inheritor’s Trust TM

Any hope of long-term planning depends squarely on the positioning of the influx of wealth in the system that is about to embark on an inter-generational journey. Will those funds simply travel one single generation in a direct outright transfer? Or will they transcend multiple generations and remain flexible for many years into the future?3

With these goals in mind, the Inheritor’s TrustTM is just in time and may end up becoming the paradigm of 21st century planning.

Until now, dynasty-style planning has taken a client’s estate as a starting point and looked prospectively, as far into the future as possible, to exploit the dependable growth of assets that are unfettered by transfer taxation and shielded from liability and serious threats over many years.

The Inheritor’s TrustTM takes a step back in time. It looks “upstream” to take better advantage of assets that the client has not yet inherited.

Intercepting an inheritance and directing it into a separate trust before the assets can be received by the client’’s estate has impressive advantages.

The funds are directed in anticipation of what the client would have done. The client exercises great influence over the funds under the terms of the trust. Yet the assets, having never belonged outright to the client, avoid exposure to debts and liabilities. Consider the other benefits:

· Even if the inherited assets are relatively small, they can have a major role if they remain in a separate trust that can continue for many years and remain out of the reach of creditors.

· Having a separate pool of assets to use as “seed money” in several contexts. Wealth-earning opportunities can be shifted to the trust at their inception so that future earnings are kept out of the client’s estate.

· A separately funded trust can also purchase life insurance, the benefits of which will not be included in the client’s gross estate.

· The Inheritor’s TrustTM can become the 1% general partner of an FLP. A relatively small amount of assets is needed, and if the funds are derived from a separate source, i.e., anyone other than the client, the trust will retain the controlling interest. The client could retain control over the FLP in a fiduciary capacity on behalf of the trust, yet his estate would only possess non-controlling interests in the FLP.

· The trust can be designed to be “intentionally defective,” i.e., in violation of grantor trust rules. Trust income can be accumulated, but if paid to beneficiaries is taxed to the grantor, allowing him to further reduce his estate.

Positioning a client as an “inheritor” and setting up a trust that keeps inheritable assets separate is a strategy with potential benefits for any estate. It can be coordinated with a generation-skipping GRAT, a buy-sell arrangement for buying out a business, state-income tax strategies, and many other techniques in an array of useful variations.

Looking Ahead

A trust for an inheritor/client certainly gets a long-term estate plan off to an excellent start. It is dynastic in its durability, yet practical enough to benefit a moderately sized estate. In many respects, it creates the same trust arrangement that the estate owner could have set up for his heirs, yet because it is set up by the estate owner’s parents, the assets can be protected far earlier, and far longer.

Editor’s Note: The Inheritor’s TrustTM is a trademark of Richard A. Oshins, Steven J. Oshins, and Noel C. Ice. This publication is not endorsing any product or attorney or providing specific legal or tax advise. It is merely making readers aware of a potentially useful strategy. ©) R. Moshman 2005.8


Technical References

1. See, e.g., Jennings, Flexible giving through the use of irrevocable gift trusts, 31 Estate Planning 7, p. 328 (July, 2004); and Moshman, Making irrevocable trusts flexible, The Estate Analyst (June, 1997).

2. The inheritor’s trust concept arrived in Oshins and Ice, The Inheritor’s TrustTM: The Art of Properly Inheriting Property, 30 Estate Planning (WG&L) 9, p. 419 (Sept., 2003) and The Inheritor’s TrustTM: Preserves Wealth as Well as Flexibility, 30 Estate Planning 9, p. 475 (Oct., 2003), a 17-page, 51-footnote, two-part work which incorporates the best of modern estate- and asset-protection planning into a comprehensive vision.

3. Portions of this article were adapted from, Moshman, New Strategies, 2004, The Estate Analyst (March, 2004). A stream of other publications took interest as well. (See, e.g., Rachel Emma Silverman, How to ask (nicely) for your inheritiance, The Wall Street Journal, May 11, 2005.)


Warning: Missing argument 2 for Utilities::createForm(), called in /home/advisorj/public_html/formsinclude.php on line 33 and defined in /home/advisorw/public_html/library/Utilities.php on line 1003
SELECT * FROM tblArticleForms WHERE intArticleID = '1176' AND siteID = : You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '' at line 1